Fit between humanitarian professionals and project requirements: hybrid group decision procedure to reduce uncertainty in decision-making

Choosing the right professional that has to meet indeterminate requirements is a critical aspect in humanitarian development and implementation projects. This paper proposes a hybrid evaluation methodology for some non-governmental organizations enabling them to select the most competent expert who can properly and adequately develop and implement humanitarian projects. This methodology accommodates various stakeholders’ perspectives in satisfying the unique requirements of humanitarian projects that are capable of handling a range of uncertain issues from both stakeholders and project requirements. The criteria weights are calculated using a two-step multi-criteria decision-making method: (1) Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process for the evaluation of the decision maker weights coupled with (2) Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to rank the alternatives which provide the ability to take into account both quantitative and qualitative evaluations. Sensitivity analysis have been developed and discussed by means of a real case of expert selection problem for a non-profit organisation. The results show that the approach allows a decrease in the uncertainty associated with decision-making, which proves that the approach provides robust solutions in terms of sensitivity analysis

Expert selection for humanitarian projects development ::a group decision making approach with incomplete information relations

This paper proposes a methodology to select an expert for the development of humanitarian and social projects based on multi-criteria decision-making with incomplete information relations to add more objectivity to the recruitment process. The proposed approach starts with assessing the decision makers (DMs) by means of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Then, Analytic Network Process (ANP) is used to weigh the criteria in order to take into account the interdependencies between criteria. In the recruiting process, an expert could be unable to assess all criteria. Therefore, the incomplete preference relations is used when a DM is unable to express his judgment. At a later stage, Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is addressed to rank the different candidates. The proposed methodology is applied to a situation where an extra DM evaluates four DMs, and six criteria are used to select one candidate among five. The obtained criteria weights and the final ranking of the candidates are analysed and compared to an approach where there is no lack of information in the decision maker’s preferences